Self-evaluation for Life Skills grade. So embarrassing. -___-
miércoles, 16 de octubre de 2013
Dear Psychologist, I Hate You
Brent Runyon’s memoir helped me
remember how much I hate psychologists. I mean, could there be more annoying
people on Earth? In my case, I was forced to visit not one, but several
psychologists. I guess I am weird. Anyway, I can totally relate with the way
Brent feels the minute he sees Dr. Rubenstein walk through his door. Or should
i call her “Dr. Bitchenstein” (95) like Brent does? By what he tells, she
really is a bitch: “Most people who come to visit me lean forward in the chair,
but she leans away.” (49) God, I was really liking the characters in this book
but Bitchenstein had to come along and ruin my fairy tale. That witch!
It is funny that most (if not
all) of Brent’s thoughts while being with a pyschologist have ocurred to me
before. “I wish she’d just leave me the fuck alone.” (59) I said this to myself
infinite times while I looked at the Medellin’s amazing view through my
psychologist’s window. “Dr. Bitchenstein is here to ask me about everything
that’s ever happened and everything that ever will happen and to try to make me
feel worse even though its not really fucking posible to make me feel worse at
this point.” (95) I wouldn't be able to come up with a better way to explain how
going to a pyschologist feels. Thank you Brent, it’s nice to know I’m not the
only one with this kind of archenemies.
Vocabulary:
gurney- (noun) a metal stretcher with wheeled legs, used for transporting patients
martes, 1 de octubre de 2013
Journal Entry #1: Brent Runyon the Freak
The first
paragraph of Brent Runyon’s memoir, The Burn Journals, seems very common for
me: “Im awake, listening to the radio, and Mom is yelling at me to get out of
bed. I don’t want to get out of bed. I don’t want to go to school. Maybe I should
play sick, but ive done that too many times this year already.” (3) I
immediately picture myself in bed pretending to be sick just because I dindnt
get enough sleep the night before, and then how karma gets me and I actually
get sick.
As I read a
couple of pages, I am confused and freaking out. For example when this guy is talking
about how obsessed he became with Vicent van Gogh while reading Lust for Life,
a book about “how fucked up his life was.” (4) He mentions the story in which
van Gogh cuts off his ear and sends it to his girlfriend. All the normal
reactions to this story include comments such as “ew,” “what the fuck,” or even
“I think van Gogh was high” but never before had I heard a comment such as
Runyon’s: “God, that’s so great.” (4) I had to read this part several times to
make sure I was actually reading correctly and not just making things up in my mind.
When I get to the part where he “puts his hand under Abby’s sweater and rubs it
against the fabric of her bra and the top of her breast,” (5) I know that this
Brent is so fudged up. He was touching a girl IN A SCHOOL BUS! Ew! Now I don’t know
what to think…
This is my first time reading The Burn
Journals and I’m so confused. I want to ask a few questions to see if later on in
the reading, they will be answered:
-Are there other reasons for his attempt of
suicide other than because he was going to get expelled?
-Is the disgusting girl from the bus, Abby,
going to be involved?
-Why is it called The Burn Journals?
-Does he keep a journal sort of like in the
movie Mean Girls?
I hope my questions will be answered. For
now, this was my first entry for my “burn journal” in which I feel a little bit
disgusted with Brent Runyon and how he thinks a bleeding ear is a “great” gift
for your girlfriend.
Vocabulary:
slats- (noun) a thin, narrow piece of wood, plastic, or metal
domingo, 29 de septiembre de 2013
Not Exactly a Fairy Tale
“Everything
looked clean, new, and beautiful. The people looked more able, stronger,
healthier, and happier… I was for once made glad by a view of extreme wealth,
without being saddened by seeing extreme poverty.” (98) I was so glad to get to
the happy ending. Normally, I would prefer something other than a happy ending,
some unexpected turn on a very predictable ending, but in Douglass’ narrative,
a happy ending was all I asked for. Has your heart ever skipped a beat and a
drop of sweat fell from your forehead (hopefully not landing on your popcorn)
in a movie when the character is in a bad situation or about to die? This was
the way I felt while reading Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass an
American Slave. I suffered through every
single page and every letter as I got to step on the shoes of the “chained and
handcuffed” (15) and their “fate for life being decided.” (40) So with the
foreseen ending, you could say I felt relieved.
As I read some
of my classmates blog posts, I don’t understand why many of them give lots of
importance to the part where Douglass doesn’t talk about his escape because he
wants to avoid others “the most embarrassing difficulties” (90) and other
reasons. Maybe if Douglass’ had included some details about this, there would
have been more action but who cares? He escaped anyway and that was what I was
praying for through the entire book. Plus, he leaves some things unsaid and
unclear which adds suspense and mystery to the ending. I, for one, will be one
of those that won’t be at peace until I find out how Douglass’ really escaped
and earned his freedom.
Going back to
the way I felt reading Frederick Douglass’ narrative, I get to the conclusion
that I got to the point where I admired him so much that he became my hero. He
is different from all the other heroes I have admired before. Instead of
wearing a red cape or awesome high heel boots, he wears nothing more than a
pair of trousers. (40) The heroes that have always been presented to us,
usually have some kind of super power such as being invisible, or they have received
tons of education or money (for example Spider Man or Iron Man). On the other
hand, Douglass became a hero from zero. His conditions were so terrible, you
could even say he started all the way from the negatives to being a role model.
He learned how to read and write (chapter VII) all by himself. He was once
invisible too but not in the way characters like Violet from The Incredibles is
but in a more cruel way. He, and all his race, was invisible to the world. No
one cared about them, no one cared for their feelings. That’s absolutely not a
superpower someone would like to have. Anyway, Douglass managed to overcome the
many obstacles put on his way and he became a role model for many including me.
Even with the
vivid descriptions and narrations, I am grateful for reading this memoir. It has
opened my eyes to the cruel reality which we know many little of because many
times, it is hidden from us. “I was now my own master” (99) he said. And now
the story is yours. Are you going to be your own master? Or will you let others
bring you down?
To compare and contrast the slavery in the times of Frederick Douglass and that of today, I read an article from The New York Times written by Quentin Hardy: Global Slavery by the Numbers. With the prices, it is easier to understand what the slave owners of today earn. In Frederick Douglass' memoir, you don't really know because the value money they used then is way different than the one we have today. I can't understand why even today, there are people who use different types of slavery (such as sexual slavery and human trafficking) as a business intelligence. I am shocked to find out that even though slavery is illegal "there are 27 million slaves worldwide, more than in 1860, when there were 25 million." It also makes me very sad to know that while I have lots of commodities, in South Asia there are many child slaves that work for example in fishing or gathering stones because this is the only way they can live.
"The developed world is a consumer of slave labor" says Dane Atkinson, chief executive of SumAll. For me, a world that in many cases relies upon slave labor, is not "developed" at all. I support foundations, such as the SumAll Foundation, that are fighting slavery and making people realize there are many other ways to survive.
Vocabulary:
evincing- (verb) reveal the presence of a quality or feeling
pomp- (noun) ceremony and splendid display
jueves, 19 de septiembre de 2013
Super Douglass
Towards the middle of Frederick Douglass’
narrative, I find myself with a perfect example of how even the most
intelligent and wise people are in some way influenced by someone (or society
as a whole) negatively. In the blink of an eye, “a man is transformed into a
brute.” (71)
In Douglass’ case, the person who greatly
influenced him in a negative way was Mr. Covey. With just two paragraphs or
even a few sentences, anyone can understand what type of person Mr. Covey was: “Mr.
Covey was a poor man; he was just commencing in life; he was only able to buy
one slave: and, as shocking as is the fact, he bought her, as he said, for a breeder.” It makes me very sad to know
that there are still people similar to Mr. Covey. In comparison to those times
of African American slavery, today there are other types of slavery such as
white slave traffic. Mr. Coveys still exist and this petrifies me. I will not
be able to sleep today.
Every time I am reading Douglass’ memoir, I
find myself suffering for him, kind of like you do on the movies for the hero
or the good guy. Douglass is becoming my hero and therefore, a role model. I hate
villain Mr. Covey because he “succeeded in breaking Douglass, crushed is
natural elasticity, languished his intellect, made his disposition to read
leave, and killed the cheerful spark in Douglass’ eye.” (71) When is Douglass
going to stop being a brute? Well, heroes always have a happy ending right? I
need to know what will happen to my hero. As for the villain, I bet karma will
come to hunt him.
jueves, 5 de septiembre de 2013
Bubble-Living
“This good spirit was from God, and to him
I offer thanksgiving and praise.” (pg. 43)
After
reading the last sentence from chapter six, I couldn’t help but feel horrible
with myself. It is at times when I read things like this, or when I pay
attention to what’s happening around me, that I feel like I just came out from
a bubble. This bubble, I’ve created on my own and I am not proud of it at all.
Many of us very rarely think past our bubble and it is outside, where we find
many people suffering from all kinds of problems for instance, hunger. Many of
us, bubble-living people, throw away or leave our plates full for many stupid
reasons for example “it tastes ugly,” “it is cold,” or the one that I disapprove
of the most, “it makes you fat.” Frederick Douglass reminded me of how ignorant
and unthankful I can be sometimes.
“The thought of owning a pair of trousers was
great indeed! It was almost a sufficient motive, not only to make me take off
what would be called by pigdrovers the mange, but the skin itself.” (pg.
40) I quickly glance at my closet that is open and watch the spot where I keep
my pants. A thought such as Douglass’ has never occurred to me. I have come to
a certain point where owning a new pair of pants (in Douglass’ case, trousers)
will not get me excited. Douglass on the other hand, was more excited the day
he got his new trousers than Colombians will be tomorrow when the soccer team
officially qualifies to the World Cup. He was dirty, probably had lots of
bruises but he was completely joyful at the thought of his new pants! While I
am sitting here typing after taking a bath, thinking I am so unlucky because my
pajamas are not warm. I am so stupid.
In conclusion, Douglass reminded me that I
have to come out of my bubble. He lived with not many material and superficial
stuff but he managed to be very happy. Also, like he says in the quote I included
at the beginning, he was thankful for all he had. All of us bubble-living people should start
living this way. I will start today. Promise :)
Ethos, Pathos, Logos and Teary Eyes
In chapters 3
and 4, Frederick Douglas makes use of ethos, pathos, and logos. He combines all
three in different ways which I really like because it gives me a clear idea of
everything and also, I like books that make me feel something other than my
eyes getting tired.
Douglass uses
ethos specially when referring to those who had great authority over him. In
chapter 3, he talks about Colonel Lloyd and gives a very elongated description
about him. “When he spoke, a slave must stand, listen, and tremble; and such
was literally the case.” (pg. 31) Another example of the use of ethos is when
he talks about Mr. Austin Gore the man who replaced Mr. Hopkins. Like he does
with Colonel Lloyd, he talks about the authority of this man and about his
faithfulness to the colonel. “He was, of all the overseers, the most dreaded by
the slaves. His presence was painful; his eye flashes confusion; and seldom was
his sharp, shrill voice heard, without producing horror and trembling in their
ranks.” (pg. 35) Lastly, Douglass also used ethos when he talks about how he
never said anything negative about his owner. This is ethos because it relates
to ethics and what was right at the time.
Next is pathos
which I think is what Douglass uses the most in the text. Pathos is used to
produce feelings and emotions and in this case, mainly sympathy. It provides
lots of feelings because it’s his own anecdotes he is telling for example: “I
have seen Winder make one of the house-servants stand off from him a suitable
distance to be touched with the end of his whip, and at every stroke raise
great ridges upon his back.” (pg. 31) Another time he uses pathos is when he narrates
what happened to Demby: “His mangled body shrank out of sight, and blood and
brains marked the water where he had stood” (pg. 36) There are all types of
examples in these two chapters were you can find pathos; from the start were he
talks about how a man of sixty years of age got whipped, all the way until the
end of chapter four were he talks about Thomas Lanman once killed a slave with
a hatchet, by knocking his brains out. In the same page, he also tells how a
woman killed his wife’s cousin (a fifteen year old girl) in the cruelest way. Afterwards,
he talks about the horrible sensation this murder produced through the entire
community.
Last is the use
of logos in the text. Even though I still find this hard to find, I think I got
some examples about how Douglass uses logos. He uses this when he talks about
what the slaves could and couldn’t do. For example “It was committed in the
presence of slaves, and they of course could neither institute a suit, nor testify
against him; and thus the guilty perpetrator of one of the bloodiest and most
foul murders goes unwhipped of justice, and uncensored by the community in
which he lives” (pg. 36) includes logos because it is something the audience is
expected to know by logic and intellect and it appeals to reason.
Up until now,
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave has caught my
attention and it keeps me interesting and wanting to read more.
Suscribirse a:
Comentarios (Atom)





